0.08/0.09 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_25116 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 13:08:06 EDT 2023 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.40 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DCb258epQp/Vampire---4.8_25116 0.15/0.40 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # sh4l with pid 25296 completed with status 0 0.15/0.40 # Result found by sh4l 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.40 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # new_ho_10 with pid 25300 completed with status 0 0.15/0.40 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.40 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.40 0.15/0.40 # Proof found! 0.15/0.40 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_22, type, x: nat). 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_23, type, y: nat). 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_24, type, z: nat). 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_25, type, pl: nat > nat > nat). 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: nat). 0.15/0.40 thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: nat). 0.15/0.40 thf(satz15, conjecture, ~(![X1:nat]:(((z)!=(pl @ x @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DCb258epQp/Vampire---4.8_25116', satz15)). 0.15/0.40 thf(satz5, axiom, ![X3:nat, X4:nat, X5:nat]:(((pl @ (pl @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(pl @ X3 @ (pl @ X4 @ X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DCb258epQp/Vampire---4.8_25116', satz5)). 0.15/0.40 thf(l, axiom, ~(![X1:nat]:(((y)!=(pl @ x @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DCb258epQp/Vampire---4.8_25116', l)). 0.15/0.40 thf(k, axiom, ~(![X3:nat]:(((z)!=(pl @ y @ X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DCb258epQp/Vampire---4.8_25116', k)). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(~(![X1:nat]:(((z)!=(pl @ x @ X1))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz15])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X15:nat, X16:nat, X17:nat]:(((pl @ (pl @ X15 @ X16) @ X17)=(pl @ X15 @ (pl @ X16 @ X17)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz5])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_6, plain, ((y)=(pl @ x @ esk1_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l])])])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X13:nat]:(((z)!=(pl @ x @ X13))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:nat, X3:nat, X4:nat]:(((pl @ (pl @ X1 @ X3) @ X4)=(pl @ X1 @ (pl @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_9, plain, ((y)=(pl @ x @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((z)=(pl @ y @ esk2_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[k])])])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:nat]:(((z)!=(pl @ x @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:nat]:(((pl @ x @ (pl @ esk1_0 @ X1))=(pl @ y @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_13, plain, ((z)=(pl @ y @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:nat]:(((pl @ y @ X1)!=(z))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.15/0.40 thf(c_0_15, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.40 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 10 0.15/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.40 # Initial clauses : 10 0.15/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.15/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.15/0.40 # Processed clauses : 11 0.15/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.15/0.40 # ...subsumed : 0 0.15/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 11 0.15/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.15/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.15/0.40 # Generated clauses : 7 0.15/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4 0.15/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.40 # Paramodulations : 6 0.15/0.40 # Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.40 # NegExts : 0 0.15/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 6 0.15/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 6 0.15/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3 0.15/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.15/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.15/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1 0.15/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 1 0.15/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 5 0.15/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.15/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.15/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.15/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2 0.15/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.15/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.15/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 11 0.15/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 344 0.15/0.40 0.15/0.40 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.40 # User time : 0.002 s 0.15/0.40 # System time : 0.002 s 0.15/0.40 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.15/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1580 pages 0.15/0.40 0.15/0.40 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.40 # User time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.40 # System time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.40 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.15/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages 0.15/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting 0.15/0.41 EOF